Report this comment
  • "Donut is absolutely right. And the facts support his position which hopefully Monty and THX will take notice of . When asked by the Judge why Manydown was not made available the QC representing the Council said because the Conservatives on the west of town campaigned against its development and did not want it. The politicisation of our planning process is now there in evidence for all to read. For the record, in the hope that people deal with facts not political loyalty or spin, SOLVE 's position is 1) no building on greenfield sites until all brownfield sites and regeneration is complete and infrastructure is in place 2) if greenfield sites are to be considered then all sites should be subject to the planning process and sites judged on their merits 3) the planning process should be free of political predetermination and manipulation. If anyone has any questions or concerns please feel free to contact SOLVE directly on info@solveloddon.org"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Manydown decision was 'lawful'

IT WAS lawful to exclude 2,000 acres of publicly-owned land from a borough-wide house-building plan, it was claimed in the High Court by a lawyer representing Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council.

Rhodri Price Lewis was defending the decision to exclude the 2,000-acre Manydown site from the Local Development Framework – a document guiding house-building until 2027.

The Manydown Company, which sold the land to the borough and Hampshire County Council for £10million in 1996, is asking the court to review the council’s decision, claiming it was unlawful.

Mr Price Lewis said the council was taking a “longer-term strategic approach” because of “planning matters” that needed to be addressed.

He said: “If the intention was to do nothing and dash any prospect of development, that would fall on the wrong side of lawful. But, in my submission, that’s not the case here.”

Mr Price Lewis said the borough’s Manydown executive committee will today consider a report into how the land can be actively “promoted” for development. This could cost up to £1million and involve three years of work.

Mr Price Lewis added: “There’s no timescale or timeline imposed either by statute, or the lease of the joint development agreement.”

Earlier, the judge, Mr Justice Lindblom asked the Manydown Company why it thought the land had been excluded.

Gregory Jones QC said: “We would suggest it is because there’s political campaigning by Conservatives in manifestos that they will stop the development, and elections are coming up this May. That’s the only explanation.”

The judge has reserved his judgement to a later date.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree