Passenger numbers fall 1.7% at Southampton airport

Passenger numbers fall 1.7% at Southampton airport Passenger numbers fall 1.7% at Southampton airport

Southampton airport saw a 1.7 per cent fall in passenger numbers in March, with a drop in flights driving the decline.

The monthly fall to 127,900 passengers in March came as flight numbers fell 8.5 per cent in the month.

Airport bosses blamed bad weather, mainly in the Channel Islands, which forced some flights to be combined and the loss of a Flybe route to Brussels, which is being resuming next week by Eastern Airways.

Numbers at Southampton airport for the past 12 months rose 2.8 per to 1.7m, although the airport is still some way behind the record 2 million passengers it welcomed in 2007 and 2008, before the economic downturn.

In its latest figures BAA reported the UK's busiest airport, Heathrow, saw 70 million passengers pass through its terminals in a 12-month period for the first time in March.

Heathrow, which has five terminals, dealt with 5.7 million passengers in March, a 6.9 per cent rise on the previous year as pre-Easter traffic occurred in March, rather than April.

Glasgow recorded a 4.6 per cent increase in traffic, while Aberdeen saw a 10.2 per cent rise.

Stansted and Edinburgh were down 4.7 per cent and 2.8 per cent respectively.

BAA airports - Southampton, Heathrow, Stansted, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen - saw an overall 4 per cent rise in passengers in the month to 8.6 million as growth at Glasgow and Aberdeen was offset by declines at Southampton, Stansted and Edinburgh.

In its trading update BAA gave no update on its latest appeal against the Competition Commission's ruling that it must sell Stansted in Essex.

Comments(7)

Taskforce 141 says...
2:16pm Wed 11 Apr 12

As i am currently looking for a holiday, i am not surprised. Southampton is more expensive than London airports and Bournemouth airport for flights!

People are looking for value for money - not to be throwing money away needlessly.

Dasal says...
4:49pm Wed 11 Apr 12

Taskforce 141 wrote:
As i am currently looking for a holiday, i am not surprised. Southampton is more expensive than London airports and Bournemouth airport for flights! People are looking for value for money - not to be throwing money away needlessly.
Take into account travel to other airports and parking if you use your own transport.

Then Southampton , imo, good value and MUCH MUCH MUCH better facilities than Bournemouth !!

Georgem says...
5:13pm Wed 11 Apr 12

Dasal wrote:
Taskforce 141 wrote:
As i am currently looking for a holiday, i am not surprised. Southampton is more expensive than London airports and Bournemouth airport for flights! People are looking for value for money - not to be throwing money away needlessly.
Take into account travel to other airports and parking if you use your own transport.

Then Southampton , imo, good value and MUCH MUCH MUCH better facilities than Bournemouth !!
Exactly. Loads of people forget this. "Oh, I saved £50 by flying from Gatwick!". How much did it cost to get there? How much time did it take? Costs a fortune to park at Heathrow, so your next best bet is National Distress, which takes over 2.5 hours each way, and costs, what? £35 per person? And you've still got to get to the coach station and back.

And, as you hinted at, Hurn is just a shack plonked at the end of a runway. Not a pleasant place to hang around.

whats_that_button_for says...
9:46pm Wed 11 Apr 12

Price check:
1. Southampton to Brussels return on Eastern Airways new route: £230
2. London to Brussels on Eurostar: £69

Even including return cost of getting to/from St. Pancras, the train is a lot cheaper.

If Eastern Airways think I'm going to pay that inflated price, they can think again! Fail! Flybe was around half the cost.

Almost £95 of the £230 was 'airport taxes' and CO2-claptrap. How to f*ck-up the economy or what?!

Georgem says...
10:16pm Wed 11 Apr 12

whats_that_button_fo
r
wrote:
Price check:
1. Southampton to Brussels return on Eastern Airways new route: £230
2. London to Brussels on Eurostar: £69

Even including return cost of getting to/from St. Pancras, the train is a lot cheaper.

If Eastern Airways think I'm going to pay that inflated price, they can think again! Fail! Flybe was around half the cost.

Almost £95 of the £230 was 'airport taxes' and CO2-claptrap. How to f*ck-up the economy or what?!
It's unfair to compare two different modes of transport, though. The train might be cheaper, but it takes a lot longer. I don't think it's as simple as saying "Fail!" because not everyone thinks "must have lowest price ticket, at all costs"

whats_that_button_for says...
4:34pm Thu 12 Apr 12

@Georgem:

"Flybe was around half the cost."

There you go... comparing like with like. Eastern Airways' price is still expensive compared to Flybe: both flights.

And as the Flybe flight no longer exists, the Eurostar becomes a necessary option to consider, and that's why I included it.

whats_that_button_for says...
4:41pm Thu 12 Apr 12

@Georgem:

"...because not everyone thinks 'must have lowest price ticket, at all costs'"

I think you'd be surprised at how many people use cost to guide their ticket choice.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree