Setback for developers promoting Micheldever New Town

Setback for developers promoting Micheldever New Town

Setback for developers promoting Micheldever New Town

First published in Winchester
Last updated
Romsey Advertiser: Photograph of the Author by

PLANS for a massive new town in central Hampshire have suffered a huge blow.

Zurich Assurance has been defeated in its latest bid to promote a 5,000-home development at Michelddever Station, north of Winchester.

The company and its forerunner Eagle Star has been lobbying for the scheme for well over 20 years.

But it has abandoned its legal challenge to Winchester City Council’s adoption of Local Plan Part 1, following the rejection of its case by the courts.

Zurich had gone to the Court of Appeal following the rejection of all of its grounds for challenge by the High Court in March.

Refusing leave to appeal, Lord Justice Sullivan said that the original judgement ‘is both comprehensive and thoroughly convincing’ and that there was no compelling reason to grant permission to appeal.

This means that any uncertainty over the Local Plan has now been removed and that it is not possible for Zurich to ask the courts to quash any part of it.

Cllr Vicki Weston, council portfolio holder for built environment, said: “We were always convinced that the challenge by Zurich was unjustified and its submission has caused a good deal of unnecessary work and expense. The council will be compiling a claim for its legal costs to be reimbursed.

“The High Court judgement dismissing Zurich’s claim was clear that the Plan was properly examined and adopted. This will be helpful in progressing Local Plan Part 2 and dealing with any relevant applications or appeals.”

This outcome helps to ensure that Winchester City Council will have strong planning policies for the future which are essential to deal with speculative development challenges that conflict with planning policies such as the new one for 500 homes at Pitt Vale, off Romsey Road, proposed by Linden Homes.

In a statement the company said this evening: “Zurich Assurance Ltd is disappointed that its request for leave to appeal against the High Court's decision to reject the terms of its legal challenge has not been granted.”

Douglas Paterson, chairman of the Dever Society, set up to fight the plans, said he was delighted by the news: “This really good news. It has been such a long struggle. It looks as if Zurich will give up trying to get their way.

“They have been looking for a chink in the armour of the plan, but eh city council planners have done such a professional job that Zurich were not able to dislodge it.

“They have now been told by top lawyers and a Appeal judge that they are wasting their time. You can never assume they have gone away for good.

“But this is really good news. Finally we can sit back and relax for a time anyway. We will be opening the champagne,” said Mr Paterson, a farmer in the middle of harvesting.

 

 

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:36pm Fri 8 Aug 14

wheresthemoneygone says...

So why has Winchester City Council made such a pathetic stance with the Silver Hill Scheme? A forthcoming stance against development at Pitt?Certain monies promised, certain influences?
So why has Winchester City Council made such a pathetic stance with the Silver Hill Scheme? A forthcoming stance against development at Pitt?Certain monies promised, certain influences? wheresthemoneygone
  • Score: 0

4:05pm Wed 13 Aug 14

Yves1977 says...

wheresthemoneygone wrote:
So why has Winchester City Council made such a pathetic stance with the Silver Hill Scheme? A forthcoming stance against development at Pitt?Certain monies promised, certain influences?
Why does the Chronicle allow this chap, who misguidedly thinks he is very clever, to put up this rubbish?
[quote][p][bold]wheresthemoneygone[/bold] wrote: So why has Winchester City Council made such a pathetic stance with the Silver Hill Scheme? A forthcoming stance against development at Pitt?Certain monies promised, certain influences?[/p][/quote]Why does the Chronicle allow this chap, who misguidedly thinks he is very clever, to put up this rubbish? Yves1977
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree